Why not Wikipedia? (part three)

Librarians have a bit of a, well, thing about checking sources to make sure what we’re seeing is fact. Which is our main gripe with Wikipedia – as an open content source, anyone can edit it. While this sometimes results in a positive collaboration which enriches the information being presented, it also means that anyone with a computer can try to skew the picture.

For instance, this weekend, shortly after Sarah Palin’s public gaffe recounting her knowledge (or lack thereof) of Paul Revere’s famous ride, her supporters were busy at work trying to edit Wikipedia’s page on Paul Revere to match what she said. After an editing war, Wikipedia finally had to lock the page.

Wikipedia can be a good place to start if you need a jumping off point into other information, but the articles themselves? Caveat emptor.


One thought on “Why not Wikipedia? (part three)

  1. Pingback: Why not Wikipedia? (Part …) « Amelia V. Gallucci-Cirio Library Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s